RSS

What is Justification?

20 Sep

Many hear the word “justification” but do not have a very good grasp on what the word means and how it relates to the Christian. Instead of attempting to explain it myself, here is a post from Grace to You which clearly explains justification, the history of this doctrine, and how it relates to the Christian lifestyle.

The Christian church today is in danger of returning to the Dark Ages. The seeker movement has Christianity turning in its Bibles; the ecumenical movement urges Christians to use worldly means to accomplish temporal ends; and current theological movements look through the lens of philosophy–Enlightenment rationalism and postmodern subjectivism–rather than Scripture. The departure from sola scriptura has led to the departure from sola fide–justification by faith alone.

Back to the Beginning
In the 1500s a fastidious monk, who by his own testimony “hated God,” was studying Paul’s epistle to the Romans. He couldn’t get past the first half of Romans 1:17: “[In the gospel] is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith” (KJV).

One simple, biblical truth changed that monk’s life–and ignited the Protestant Reformation. It was the realization that God’s righteousness could become the sinner’s righteousness–and that could happen through the means of faith alone. Martin Luther found the truth in the same verse he had stumbled over, Romans 1:17: “Therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, the just shall live by faith” (KJV, emphasis added).

Luther had always seen “the righteousness of God” as an attribute of the sovereign Lord by which He judged sinners–not an attribute sinners could ever possess. He described the breakthrough that put an end to the theological dark ages:

I saw the connection between the justice of God and the statement that “the just shall live by his faith.” Then I grasped that the justice of God is that righteousness by which through grace and sheer mercy God justifies us through faith. Thereupon I felt myself to be reborn and to have gone through open doors into paradise. The whole of Scripture took on a new meaning, and whereas before the “justice of God” had filled me with hate, now it became to me inexpressibly sweet in greater love. This passage of Paul became to me a gate to heaven.

Justification by faith was the great truth that dawned on Luther and dramatically altered the church. Because Christians are justified by faith alone, their standing before God is not in any way related to personal merit. Good works and practical holiness do not provide the grounds for acceptance with God. God receives as righteous those who believe, not because of any good thing He sees in them–not even because of His own sanctifying work in their lives–but solely on the basis of Christ’s righteousness, which is reckoned to their account. “To the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness” (Romans 4:5). That is justification.

Declared Righteous: What Actually Changes?
In its theological sense, justification is a forensic, or purely legal, term. It describes what God declares about the believer, not what He does to change the believer. In fact, justification effects no actual change whatsoever in the sinner’s nature or character. Justification is a divine judicial edict. It changes our status only, but it carries ramifications that guarantee other changes will follow. Forensic decrees like this are fairly common in everyday life.

When I was married, for example, Patricia and I stood before the minister (my father) and recited our vows. Near the end of the ceremony, my father declared, “By the authority vested in me by the state of California, I now pronounce you man and wife.” Instantly we were legally husband and wife. Whereas seconds before we had been an engaged couple, now we were married. Nothing inside us actually changed when those words were spoken. But our status changed before God, the law, and our family and friends. The implications of that simple declaration have been lifelong and life-changing (for which I am grateful). But when my father spoke those words, it was a legal declaration only.

Similarly, when a jury foreman reads the verdict, the defendant is no longer “the accused.” Legally and officially he instantly becomes either guilty or innocent–depending on the verdict. Nothing in his actual nature changes, but if he is found not guilty he will walk out of court a free person in the eyes of the law, fully justified.

In biblical terms, justification is a divine verdict of “not guilty–fully righteous.” It is the reversal of God’s attitude toward the sinner. Whereas He formerly condemned, He now vindicates. Although the sinner once lived under God’s wrath, as a believer he or she is now under God’s blessing.

Justification is more than simple pardon; pardon alone would still leave the sinner without merit before God. So when God justifies He imputes divine righteousness to the sinner (Romans 4:22-25). Christ’s own infinite merit thus becomes the ground on which the believer stands before God (Romans 5:19; 1 Corinthians 1:30; Philippians 3:9). So justification elevates the believer to a realm of full acceptance and divine privilege in Jesus Christ.

Therefore, because of justification, believers not only are perfectly free from any charge of guilt (Romans 8:33) but also have the full merit of Christ reckoned to their personal account (Romans 5:17). Here are the forensic realities that flow out of justification:

We are adopted as sons and daughters (Romans 8:15)
We become fellow-heirs with Christ (v. 17)
We are united with Christ so that we become one with Him (1 Corinthians 6:17)
We are henceforth “in Christ” (Galatians 3:27) and He in us (Colossians 1:27)

How Justification and Sanctification Differ
Justification is distinct from sanctification because in justification God does not make the sinner righteous; He declares that person righteous (Romans 3:28; Galatians 2:16). Notice how justification and sanctification are distinct from one another:

Justification imputes Christ’s righteousness to the sinner’s account (Romans 4:11b); sanctification imparts righteousness to the sinner personally and practically (Romans 6:1-7; 8:11-14).
Justification takes place outside sinners and changes their standing (Romans 5:1-2, sanctification is internal and changes the believer’s state (Romans 6:19).
Justification is an event, sanctification a process.

Those two must be distinguished but can never be separated. God does not justify whom He does not sanctify, and He does not sanctify whom He does not justify. Both are essential elements of salvation.

Why differentiate between them at all? If justification and sanctification are so closely related that you can’t have one without the other, why bother to define them differently? That question was the central issue between Rome and the Reformers in the sixteenth century, and it remains the main front in renewed attacks against justification.

Justification in Roman Catholic Doctrine
Roman Catholicism blends its doctrines of sanctification and justification. Catholic theology views justification as an infusion of grace that makes the sinner righteous. In Catholic theology, then, the ground of justification is something made good within the sinner–not the imputed righteousness of Christ.

The Council of Trent, Rome’s response to the Reformation, pronounced anathema on anyone who says “that the [sinner] is justified by faith alone–if this means that nothing else is required by way of cooperation in the acquisition of the grace of justification.” The Catholic council ruled “Justification … is not remission of sins merely, but also the sanctification and renewal of the inward man, through the voluntary reception of the grace, and of the gifts, whereby man of unjust becomes just.” So Catholic theology confuses the concepts of justification and sanctification and substitutes the righteousness of the believer for the righteousness of Christ.

What’s the Big Deal?
The difference between Rome and the Reformers is no example of theological hair-splitting. The corruption of the doctrine of justification results in several other grievous theological errors.

If sanctification is included in justification, the justification is a process, not an event. That makes justification progressive, not complete. Our standing before God is then based on subjective experience, not secured by an objective declaration. Justification can therefore be experienced and then lost. Assurance of salvation in this life becomes practically impossible because security can’t be guaranteed. The ground of justification ultimately is the sinner’s own continuing present virtue, not Christ’s perfect righteousness and His atoning work.

What’s so important about the doctrine of justification by faith alone? It is the doctrine upon which the confessing church stands or falls. Without it there is no salvation, no sanctification, no glorification–nothing. You wouldn’t know it to look at the state of Christianity today, but it really is that important.

Here is the link below to the blog, I posted most of the article but not the full article. http://www.gty.org/resources/Articles/A194_Justification-by-Faith#.Tnj4fuvIbw4

Let us rejoice in what Christ has done for us, and find comfort in this truth knowing we are justified by the works of Christ and not our own.

Advertisements
 
2 Comments

Posted by on September 20, 2011 in Encouragement, Justification

 

2 responses to “What is Justification?

  1. vivator

    September 20, 2011 at 11:35 PM

    Obviously Catholic and Reformer understanding of Justification is different. Unfortunately you do not present correctly Catholic position. You wrote “Catholic theology confuses the concepts of justification and sanctification and substitutes the righteousness of the believer for the righteousness of Christ.” Catholic theology (1) does not confuse Justification and Sanctification and (2) we do not use our righteousness for our Justification. For more detail you are welcome to read my article where I compare side by side Catholic and Reformer position on Justification at: http://vivacatholic.wordpress.com/223-2/
    Let me know if I wrongly wrote about Reformer’s position of Justification.

     
  2. vtyler98

    September 21, 2011 at 12:19 AM

    Vivator, I did not write the post on justification, it is from John MacArthur’s website which is why I put it in quotations. The article makes it clear that justification is not an on-going process, it is completed once a person has been saved. Romans 8:28-30 makes this strikingly clear, with verse 30 stating as follows: “And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified” while Romans 5:1 also says “Therefore, since we have been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ” (ESV). From your site, the justification Catholics believe in is state as an ongoing process. If this were so, the word in Romans 8:30 and 5:1 would be in the present or imperfect tense, which would indicate the ongoing and continual process of justification. Instead however, Romans 5:1 uses the word for justification (Δικαιωθεντες) is used in the Aorist tense, which is usually translated in the past tense (i.e. a completed action). Justification is also used in the passive voice in Romans 5:1 thus indicating the subject of the sentence (believers, those who are converted) are receiving this justification (from God). IF justification were to be an ongoing process which is continual, it would be in either the imperfect or present tense and have other clues in the sentence to do so. Also the English translation gives evidence as well, justified is a completed action, whereas if it was ongoing it would be “is justifying” or “will continue to justify” or something along those lines. For sake of space will not go into Romans 8:30 but it offers even stronger support for this view of justification as being completed through the work of Christ. Roman Catholicism does seem to confuse sanctification and justification, as this from MacArthur says: “‘The Council of Trent, Rome’s response to the Reformation, pronounced anathema on anyone who says ‘that the [sinner] is justified by faith alone–if this means that nothing else is required by way of cooperation in the acquisition of the grace of justification.’ The Catholic council ruled ‘Justification … is not remission of sins merely, but also the sanctification and renewal of the inward man, through the voluntary reception of the grace, and of the gifts, whereby man of unjust becomes just.’”

    I am not interested in arguing on here about this, for this site is here to edify one another and glorify God. I will also add this, make sure you never let your theology determine how you interpret the Bible. Many false religions and cults have sprung up from people who did not correctly interpret Scripture or came to it with a pre-conceived idea in mind of what the text meant and made it fit their own personal idea. The Bible is inspired by God, and we must let our theology and beliefs be determined by what God has revealed in His Word and not by denomination, culture, background, or pre-conceived beliefs. I hope this comment will add clarity to what you brought up.

     

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
In Christ Jesus

There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus

%d bloggers like this: